Over the past couple of years, my good friend and co-worker Matt has been putting a great deal of effort into reflecting on his homosexuality, among other parts of his life. He has been reading widely, flying around the country to talk with people he feels like can help him during this season. Â And just about every Thursday night we have hung out on his back porch talking about where he is in this process. Â Processing what we are both thinking, and reading. Â Sometimes the discussions have been low-key and fun, and other conversations have been more intense.
I have been blessed by not only Matt’s friendship and his walk with Christ; but also by his honesty and willingness to allow me to walk beside him on this path. Â I am very fortunate.
Today, Matt passed along a letter written in 2005 by The Very Rev. Dr. Peter Short, Moderator of the United Church of Canada. Â The United Church of Canada was responding to Canada’s passage of Bill C-38 which allowed civil marriage for same-sex couples. Â The United Church had churches within it that both were celebrating this passage and churches that were against its passage. Â Dr. Short speaks wise words to our neighbors to the north.
As the issue of same-sex unions and the definition of marriage come more and more into our cultural and political dialogue, we that are followers of Jesus (regardless of our perspective on those issues) would do very well to carefully reflect on his challenge to give primacy to what deserves primacy. Â Certainly vigorous debate is ahead of us, and should be. Â But as Paul reminds us in 1 Cor. 13, how we speak is as important as what we say. Â So, let me allow The Very Rev. Dr. Peter Short to take it from here…
THE VERY REV. DR. PETER SHORT
Pastoral Letter Following the Passage of Same-Sex Marriage LegislationJune 29, 2005
Sisters and Brothers in The United Church of Canada,
Greetings in Christ!
Yesterday the Parliament of Canada passed legislation granting gay and lesbian couples legal access to civil marriage. This legislation comes as no surprise. The question has been debated and contested in a very public manner. The United Church of Canada has been an active participant in this issue in the 18 months since the 38th General Council asked the government to include same-sex marriage in the marriage legislation. During this time, United Church congregations have been encouraged to assess and determine their marriage policies with respect to same-gender couples.
This legislation is no surprise to anyone who has been in touch with current events in church and society. Nonetheless, it represents a profound change in civil society’s definition of marriage-an institution that stands at the heart of Canadian family life. It may not be a surprise to the mind that has been tracking the trajectory of the legislation, but the heart is deeply surprised as the legislation makes the passage from theoretical debate to law of the land.
I am writing to offer my support to congregations, missions, outreach ministries, chaplaincies, and all our people in ministry as you continue to live into the questions, celebrations, dilemmas, and opportunities that arise with the passage of this legislation. Although our hearts may be surprised in different ways-some dejected, others elated-I am inviting all to recognize that we are living in a surprising moment, one that calls for compassion for one another and faith for the journey as our church makes this passage into a changed world.
In the days before the legislation passed, the scripture spoke to me in a way I had not expected. I was listening to a text that is not specifically about marriage. It spoke to me just the same.
The text is in the 14th chapter of the gospel according to Luke; the parable of the great dinner to which many guests were invited (Luke 14:15-24). Jesus told this parable on his way to the house of a leader of the Pharisees where he was to eat a meal on the Sabbath (14:1). The conversation on the way to the dinner turned on the perennial gospel questions: What is near to the heart of God and who may draw near to the holy (14:2-6)? What is the relationship between honour and humility (14:7-11)? And what is the true nature of hospitality (14:12-14)? These questions form the prelude to the parable of the great dinner.
The parable begins when someone observes, “Blessed is anyone who will eat bread in the Kingdom of God.” (14:15b). Jesus responds to this observation by telling of an invitation to a great dinner and of the litany of excuses offered in response to the invitation. One invited guest was tied up with real estate and sent his regrets. Another had just taken delivery of new equipment and had to test it. Yet another had just been-lo and behold!-married, and couldn’t make it. So the great dinner is on (“Blessed is anyone who will eat bread in the Kingdom of God”) and all manner of busy people are rising up together to miss it.
This is what I heard as I listened to the text. The great table is set; the great dinner is on. One may be occupied and preoccupied by any number of compelling issues, but the great banquet is happening. One may feel that the world is falling apart and send regrets to the host because there is too much to be done in holding the world together. Still, the banquet is on. One may be committed to marriage and refuse to come, as if marriage were in competition with the great banquet and not the result of it.
All of this is to say that principles (no matter the stripe) may be what we have instead of faith. Principles (no matter the stripe) may be more to us than the great invitation. Though we may not intend it, principles may cause us to have ears only for the sounds of our own interests and not for the surprising invitation to join the unlikely guests at the table where there is room for all who will come.
As your congregation makes the passage into a Canada that welcomes civil marriage for same-gender couples, please accept my prayers and encouragement that you may hear the invitation and show up for the dinner you never intended to miss. And “blessed is anyone who will eat bread in the Kingdom of God.”
Meanwhile, I offer the following observations about the import of the legislation.
Bill C-38 is directed toward civil society and not toward religious marriage in church, temple, synagogue, or any other recognized place of religious marriage. The legislation provides for the protection of religious freedom, including tax exemption status, for communities where conscience does not permit the celebration of same-gender marriage.
The decision on who may be married in and by The United Church of Canada is made by the congregation through its Session or equivalent. Some congregations have been celebrating same-gender covenants for a long time. For them, the move to same-gender marriage may be a seamless one. Some congregations will be lamenting the passage of the legislation and will find it to be against conscience to permit same-gender marriage in the church. For them, the decision is a difficult one because they may be exposed to ridicule and to charges of homophobia. Most congregations include valued members on both sides of the issue, as well as people whose minds and hearts are still in a struggle to discern the good path. For them, the unity of the congregation is at stake and the stakes are high.
As Moderator of the whole church, not just parts of it, I acknowledge that we are not of one mind and not of one vision on this. We are surprised in the heart by what is happening. We find ourselves in a place that is both dilemma and opportunity. This place is dilemma because our unity is challenged by the differences among us. This place is opportunity because we have yet another chance to receive the gifts brought forth from the storehouse of diversity that we have so often put forward as one of our great strengths.
This would be a good time to pray for one another. This would be a bad time to be carried off by the songs of victory or by the laments of resentment. Beneath the louder music of public ideologies there is a gospel invitation that is being sounded, an invitation to a great banquet. And “blessed is anyone who will eat bread in the Kingdom of God.”
May the Holy Spirit guide you in the way of Christ, opening ears and hearts to the sounds of God’s surprising invitation. May you be aware of my gratitude on behalf of the whole church for your witness to Jesus Christ and your servant ministry in his name. And may you receive the bread that feeds you as his body, a sign of the banquet of God.
Sincerely,
The Right Rev. Dr. Peter Short
Moderator, The United Church of Canada
What do you think? Â What would you add to this? Â Let’s chat.
Grant Richardson said...
1I love the honesty and the open mindedness of the message – let’s remember what is important in our faith, and it is not us imposing on others our beliefs but rather our accepting God’s invitation to come to him. That said, we still have to live our life as we believe God wants us to. That may conflict with others position but it should not cause us to leave the “banquet.”
09/24/10 2:08 PM | Comment Link
Becca said...
2Hmmmmm…where to start?
I like Rev. Short’s point that the legislation is merely that…legislation, giving civil-union rights to homosexual couples.
I have to say that I have trouble understanding why people are against allowing civil-unions. I mean really if you are that concerned with the preservation of marriage in America, maybe heterosexual Christians should be more focused on why heterosexual marriages IN the church are failing at a higher rate than in the general population.
Anyway, I completely forgot what else I was going to say so maybe I will do a repost later…
09/24/10 2:31 PM | Comment Link
EG said...
3I’m not into a lot of words, I like to boil things down. So here’s what I get from Rev. Short – politics (his word – “principles”) isn’t the point – God is the point. Keep your eye on the prize, which is your relationship with God.
For me the question of gay marriage is very, very simple. Separation of church and state. It’s what our country was founded on and we need to uphold that value. Secondly, I think Christians in this country are smug about being in the majority. They think it’s safe to restrict others’ rights (civil or religious) because they’re in the statistical majority. When we mingle religion with laws, we open the door to all kinds of discrimination. And eventually, that discrimination will be against us. Legalizing homosexual marriage in this country is a civil question, not a religious one. And whether we legalize it or not, God doesn’t change.
09/27/10 6:32 AM | Comment Link
Michael said...
4I liked the tone of the letter as well.
Although Christians are in the statistical majority, several recent polls suggest that a slim majority of Americans now support gay marriage:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/11/americans-split-evenly-on-gay-marriage/
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/weekinreview/22gay.html?_r=3
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0910/Majorities_buy_right_to_marry_in_second_poll.html
This issue is only going to get bigger and bigger as several high-profile cases reach higher courts.
09/27/10 9:49 PM | Comment Link
Edd said...
5It pleased me to see this discussion. Marriage is a civil issue even though we have made it into a religious ritual. You don’t have to be married in a church, temple, synagogue or mosque to be married. Indeed, the clergy who performs the rite of marriage in a religious setting says “by the authority invested in my by the Commonwealth of Virginia [or other appropriate civil jurisdiction] . . . .”
My own denominations (United Church of Christ and Alliance of Baptists) have taken firm stands about equality of marriage for all. Some of our churches do perform same-sex marriage or commitment rituals while others do not.
When I read the gospel narratives and note those who were considered friends and followers of Jesus, I cannot help but wonder what Jesus meant by statements such as “love your neighbor as yourself” and “it has been said of old, but I say to you.” Perhaps God IS still speaking, but are we listening?
Thanks Jim for freely discussing this divisive issue so openly and prayerfully.
10/22/10 8:35 AM | Comment Link
jim said...
6Edd, it is great to hear from you again. I have missed our gym conversations. I agree this conversation needs to continue. I liked his reminder to not allow the intensity of the discussion to cause those of us who follow Jesus to miss the main thing. That doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t continue to express our views on this issue (and many others). But it gets at how we do that… Again, glad to hear you are doing better than you expected! 🙂
10/26/10 1:48 PM | Comment Link
jim said...
7I agree Michael. Hope you are well my friend.
10/26/10 1:49 PM | Comment Link
jim said...
8Thank you EG for sharing your perspective. While I agree that the church doesn’t operate very well when it is attached to political power (honestly not much does,) I would suggest a different look. I am sure there are some smug Christians out there, as I am sure there are smug non-Christians out there as well. The issue is the distinction between homosexual “marriage” and homosexual “civil unions.”
Marriage is a very sacred thing to most Christians. We believe that God invented the concept, and that the joining of a husband and wife is more than a civil event, it is a deeply spiritual moment. One that transforms you for the rest of your life. Most Christians that I speak with would distinguish the two things. To take something as deeply meaningful as marriage and shift its operation, its identity, is tough. Yes, Christians have, in some cases, been too brusque with others’ beliefs, but does that make doing the same thing back okay? I would suggest not.
Civil union, however, is a different thing. It truly is an official designation that entitles two people to have access to certain rights and privileges based on their mutual consent. I would suggest that your concern about discrimination would be more suited dealing with civil unions than marriage.
I would love to hear your continued thoughts and will try very hard to respond more rapidly.
10/26/10 2:00 PM | Comment Link
jim said...
9Thanks for your thoughts Grant. Hope you are well.
10/26/10 2:01 PM | Comment Link
samy said...
10$author, Very good article, well written and very thought out
11/12/11 11:22 PM | Comment Link